Kommentare zu: http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2009/01/status-report-kde-42-and-freebsd-64-support/ /usr/home/miwi Sun, 27 Jun 2010 15:45:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 Von: pastor http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2009/01/status-report-kde-42-and-freebsd-64-support/comment-page-1/#comment-641 pastor Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:32:26 +0000 http://bsdcrew.de/blog/?p=252#comment-641 shit ... :( shit … :(

]]> Von: DimanNe http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2009/01/status-report-kde-42-and-freebsd-64-support/comment-page-1/#comment-640 DimanNe Wed, 20 May 2009 13:16:59 +0000 http://bsdcrew.de/blog/?p=252#comment-640 6.4 support must be dropped 6.4 support must be dropped

]]> Von: arturbac http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2009/01/status-report-kde-42-and-freebsd-64-support/comment-page-1/#comment-639 arturbac Tue, 12 May 2009 22:23:56 +0000 http://bsdcrew.de/blog/?p=252#comment-639 What about the gcc4 port on 6.4 ? Let me explain: 6.x is the latest stable working release of FreeBSD on many desktops. 7.x in my opinion is still only an alpha buggy release. After year of reporting bugs in filesystem on SATA Nvidia nforce platform there is still imposible to use 7,x branch with amd64 with that chip, 6,x is working fine ... What about the gcc4 port on 6.4 ?

Let me explain:
6.x is the latest stable working release of FreeBSD on many desktops.
7.x in my opinion is still only an alpha buggy release.

After year of reporting bugs in filesystem on SATA Nvidia nforce platform there is still imposible to use 7,x branch with amd64 with that chip, 6,x is working fine …

]]> Von: MK http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2009/01/status-report-kde-42-and-freebsd-64-support/comment-page-1/#comment-638 MK Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:59:47 +0000 http://bsdcrew.de/blog/?p=252#comment-638 Ouch. Heckuva way to find out. I didn't see a comment in /usr/ports/UPDATING. Maybe I missed it, though I try to read it as carefully as I can. Maybe the latest port revisions shouldn't be in the ports tree for 6.4 if they don't build. Will KDE42 build & run using akonadi-1.0.0_1, phonon-4.2.0_1 ? Not all of us have have a fixation/fetish about compiling the latest sources the moment they're released. :-) Ouch. Heckuva way to find out. I didn’t see a comment in /usr/ports/UPDATING. Maybe I missed it, though I try to read it as carefully as I can. Maybe the latest port revisions shouldn’t be in the ports tree for 6.4 if they don’t build.

Will KDE42 build & run using akonadi-1.0.0_1, phonon-4.2.0_1 ?

Not all of us have have a fixation/fetish about compiling the latest sources the moment they’re released. :-)

]]> Von: Status report KDE 4.2 and FreeBSD 6.4 support | FreeBSD - the unknown Giant http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2009/01/status-report-kde-42-and-freebsd-64-support/comment-page-1/#comment-637 Status report KDE 4.2 and FreeBSD 6.4 support | FreeBSD - the unknown Giant Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:31:48 +0000 http://bsdcrew.de/blog/?p=252#comment-637 [...] 4.2 and FreeBSD 6.4 support Saturday, February 7th, 2009 | FreeBSD | Gerard Martin Wilke announced that KDE 4.2 (FreeBSD) is ready for testing. He’s also interested to find out how many users [...] [...] 4.2 and FreeBSD 6.4 support Saturday, February 7th, 2009 | FreeBSD | Gerard Martin Wilke announced that KDE 4.2 (FreeBSD) is ready for testing. He’s also interested to find out how many users [...]

]]> Von: Chris Ruiz http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2009/01/status-report-kde-42-and-freebsd-64-support/comment-page-1/#comment-636 Chris Ruiz Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:22:53 +0000 http://bsdcrew.de/blog/?p=252#comment-636 AFAIK 6.x is basically EOL and there will be no future releases, so it doesn't make sense to go out of your way to support it. AFAIK 6.x is basically EOL and there will be no future releases, so it doesn’t make sense to go out of your way to support it.

]]> Von: Aron Schlesinger http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2009/01/status-report-kde-42-and-freebsd-64-support/comment-page-1/#comment-635 Aron Schlesinger Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:13:33 +0000 http://bsdcrew.de/blog/?p=252#comment-635 I’m in complete agreement too with Daniel here. I’m in complete agreement too with Daniel here.

]]> Von: wen http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2009/01/status-report-kde-42-and-freebsd-64-support/comment-page-1/#comment-634 wen Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:51:36 +0000 http://bsdcrew.de/blog/?p=252#comment-634 I’m in agreement dropping support for 6.4. I’m in agreement dropping support for 6.4.

]]> Von: kein KDE 4.x für FreeBSD 6.x » F!XMBR http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2009/01/status-report-kde-42-and-freebsd-64-support/comment-page-1/#comment-633 kein KDE 4.x für FreeBSD 6.x » F!XMBR Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:24:58 +0000 http://bsdcrew.de/blog/?p=252#comment-633 [...] want us to release new versions in a timely manner, please pitch in and help. So miwi auf seinem Blog. Und dem ist auch nicht viel hinzuzufügen, zwei Maintainer reißen sich auf gut Deutsch den Arsch [...] [...] want us to release new versions in a timely manner, please pitch in and help. So miwi auf seinem Blog. Und dem ist auch nicht viel hinzuzufügen, zwei Maintainer reißen sich auf gut Deutsch den Arsch [...]

]]> Von: Gustau Pérez http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2009/01/status-report-kde-42-and-freebsd-64-support/comment-page-1/#comment-632 Gustau Pérez Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:16:31 +0000 http://bsdcrew.de/blog/?p=252#comment-632 If homepower is limited, support for 6.X should be dropped. The reason is that the main FreeBSD site states that 6.4 is legacy. So support should be granted for production series, and if possible and feasible, grant support for legacy. If homepower is limited, support for 6.X should be dropped. The reason is that the main FreeBSD site states that 6.4 is legacy. So support should be granted for production series, and if possible and feasible, grant support for legacy.

]]>